View Single Post
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 09-18-2006, 05:34 PM
OSU8085's Avatar
OSU8085 OSU8085 is offline
Oregon State Fan
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Beaverton, Oregon
Posts: 423
Quote:
Originally Posted by Autzen Powers
yeah, the Oregon player definitely seemed to have touched it first after looking it the review. And the call was that a Sooner touched it first. If anything was in question in the play, it was 2 things: 1) the 10 yard rule, making it a live ball if it had gone ten yards, then it would have been okay for the Oregon guy to have touched it. But that wasn't what the call was ruled on the field. 2) Who recovered it right before the whistle blew. The whistle blew right away - when the officials said they saw an Oregon guy recover it, ( I couldn't tell who got it first) but if the Oregon guy did get it and the whistle blew then- it's a moot point if the Oklahoma guy scrapped for it and got it later. This is how I understand it. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.

Either way, it seemed to be a bad call...sorry Ducks!
a Duck player never had anything close to possesion...it wasa horrendous call but seriously OU needs to stop acting like babies....you miss a 30 yard field goal to win it-you had a great chance to win and you blew it, nor could you put it in the endzone when the score was 30-20 with a guy named Adrian Peterson...around here thats called a CHOKE JOB (OU fans: for a further defintion on "choke job" ask Alexis Serna)
Reply With Quote