![]() |
| |||
| Booty vs. Sanchez So, who is better suited to take over Leinart's old job? Mark Sanchez: huge arm and touted by Norm Chow as the best QB recruit he's ever seen John David Booty: better touch on the ball (supposedly), has game experience, been expected to take over since day 1 Also, both were the top QB recruits in the nation their respective years. It seems like either should be able to do the job but the situation is kind of like choosing between a Carson Palmer (arm) vs. a Matt Leinart (ball control).
__________________ Pomona|USC |
| |||
| More importantly I'm just glad that USC jerseys don't have last names on them because I would hate to have to see grown men worshipping a guy named "Booty." That would just be embarrassing and sad.
__________________ Pomona|USC |
| |||
| Sanchez over booty I always thought Sanchez was the better qback, but because of his off the field problems, Booty was an arguable choice. Now that booty FLOPPED against Stanford, I think Sanchez should take over. I totally agree coaches should not give the spot to the better arm, ball control and overall controlling the tempo produces more wins - this is a fact. UW made the same mistake with Brock Huard over Tuiosisopo. Big "T" did not have the arm, but posted a better record 10-1 over Huard 7-4. ![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |